RobbieB
Rodentus scientificus
Perhaps if we are going to outlaw wristguards, then perhaps the PGA should go back to wooden clubs with metal shafts, professional tennis players go back to wooden racquets, cricket to small thin bats, NRL to old leather balls etc...
Steve, as I said above, there is a difference between various levels of equipment that are used by sportsmen, and a device designed to allow physically less able people to enhance their use of that equipment.
Bowling at it's core is an accuracy based sport, a wrist guard in no way shape or form will improve your accuracy, sure it helps with a more consistent release but if you are inaccurate you will be with or without a wrist guard. Olympic shooters and archers have all sorts of aids to assist their accuracy, but I don't hear them complaining.
If you're worrying about the person you are playing against wearing a wrist guard, then your mind's not in the right place and maybe you should focus a bit more on your own game.
I spent 25 years bowling without a wrist guard and the last 7 with one, and trust me I can leave an 8-10 with or without one
Bowling should be about accuracy WITH power. There have been great bowlers who lean towards one or the other extremes, but both are required in some measure. They don't worry me when I am competing, nor do I care on a competitive level if people choose to use them - they are not illegal and are freely available to everyone. I do feel they detract from the integrity of the sport to some extent though, and I can personally relate instances of competitive sportspeople from other sports being quite bemused and critical that they are allowed in competition. Anyway, thats JMHO.