oh by the way
i can see that it would be beneficial to the host centre not to have the extra team, especially in losing the extra $550 in lineage fees.
but we don't have committee's to make money, just spend it
and most the time spending it on tea, coffee and meals whilst volunteering their duties, at compulsory events like championships
that are compulsory for people to bowl in, which include a fee for us to pay for their meals, whilst we invest money to win 10% of it back, oops break even when we take our meals and drinks out.
thats if you win an event
the sooner all committees are abolished the better
and the same for walter de veer
and the same for anyone else that free loads
you can all go play bingo or something
cause if you loved bowling as much as you say you do, you would be trying to foster and promote and getting as many people to participate as you possibly could
instead you find petty ways to stop growth and then wonder why you can't get the numbers :!: :!: :!:
i can see that it would be beneficial to the host centre not to have the extra team, especially in losing the extra $550 in lineage fees.
but we don't have committee's to make money, just spend it
and most the time spending it on tea, coffee and meals whilst volunteering their duties, at compulsory events like championships
that are compulsory for people to bowl in, which include a fee for us to pay for their meals, whilst we invest money to win 10% of it back, oops break even when we take our meals and drinks out.
thats if you win an event
the sooner all committees are abolished the better
and the same for walter de veer
and the same for anyone else that free loads
you can all go play bingo or something
cause if you loved bowling as much as you say you do, you would be trying to foster and promote and getting as many people to participate as you possibly could
instead you find petty ways to stop growth and then wonder why you can't get the numbers :!: :!: :!: