Thanks Bec, exactly the point I was going to make. Let's ignore Commonwealth Games to 'be seen' at Nationals?Yeah a meeting about getting the commonwealth games to the gold coast... I think that's pretty important!!
Thanks Bec, exactly the point I was going to make. Let's ignore Commonwealth Games to 'be seen' at Nationals?Yeah a meeting about getting the commonwealth games to the gold coast... I think that's pretty important!!
When the Nationals are on all the Country is represented, it is the best opportunity for Cara to meet and greet also hear what bowlers of all averages think & a way of just talking to get to know her membership. I know I am going back in time but for the entire time the Nationals were on the then President, Secretary & most Directors were in attendance. Dockers
When the Nationals are on all the Country is represented, it is the best opportunity for Cara to meet and greet also hear what bowlers of all averages think & a way of just talking to get to know her membership. I know I am going back in time but for the entire time the Nationals were on the then President, Secretary & most Directors were in attendance. Dockers
Every single event....... that's right, I forgot. It was ONLY the nationals. Meetings are far more important.
I don't have an issue with that at all Michael. Like I said, it is only the Nationals and only the biggest event on our calendar. Other things are obviously more important.
I don't have an issue with that at all Michael. Like I said, it is only the Nationals and only the biggest event on our calendar. Other things are obviously more important.
I don't have an issue with that at all Michael. Like I said, it is only the Nationals and only the biggest event on our calendar. Other things are obviously more important.
When the Nationals are on all the Country is represented, it is the best opportunity for Cara to meet and greet also hear what bowlers of all averages think & a way of just talking to get to know her membership. I know I am going back in time but for the entire time the Nationals were on the then President, Secretary & most Directors were in attendance. Dockers
Michael
Given I assume your intent is not to infer that everyone associated with the ATBC in the past was on your perceived "gravy train".....as noted in the selected segments below from your recent post:
"It isn't like the old days of the ATBC where awards etc, paid trips and the perks and lurks were a plenty and the CEO, President and whoever could attend a 2 week gravy train all expenses paid trip to the Nationals every year.
"I highly doubt that money just goes into someones pocket at the end of the day, remember it isn't the ATBC anymore".
.................perhaps you might care to be specific and name those, using this forum as the vehicle, who in your view were involved in the process of [apparently making] "money just goes into someones pocket at the end of the day".
Naming those involved would not only clear the air away from casting a shadow over each and every person who served the ATBC at every Nationals [run by the Congress] from the very inception of the tournament itself, it would certainly be a significant exhibition of intestinal fortitude on your own behalf.
I look forward to reading your list of names.
Stephen Jones
I don't have an issue with that at all Michael. Like I said, it is only the Nationals and only the biggest event on our calendar. Other things are obviously more important.
important people go to important meetings...
Sorry Casual Observer; but you really are a douchebag... You bring nothing constructive to this forum at all; just bag out other people all the time... For reasons I dont know. You seem like a bitter old man who never made it big; despite wanting too... You need to quit it cause it actually puts a taint on this entire forum for the people like yourself that are constantly negative....
Perhaps the issue is not the sarcasm in my posts but the way in which other people on here seem to think the nationals is just another event. I have no issue, and I really don't care, what Cara does or doesn't do. What I have issue with is the fact that the usual suspects on here justify everything with stupidity.
As for you Bluey, you need to learn comprehension. No one has said Cara does not put time and effort into bowling. Ever heard a saying about a pot and a kettle?
I have no doubt that those with few brain cells will post some sort of unrelated reply to this but I really don't care.
Michael :
Lets face it, all past versions of the national body have had some issues, whether it being not totally financially responsible, over spending, lack of action, broken promises etc etc, but it doesn't mean this current version is not trying its hardest to get things on track and develop the sport.
Michael :
And Jim is also right, who gives a rats about the past when we should be trying to improve the future.
Michael............I know you well enough to know that making off the cuff, thoughtless, generalisations are not your usual style. You know me well enough to know that if you do happen to engage in these, as rare an event as it might be, I will pull you up. You and people like George, Jason and others are the leaders of this sport today Michael - I don't mean future leaders - because the future is now.
There are things that "irk" you as you note - there are things that "irk" me as well - as you would imagine. One of those is broad, uneducated, ill informed, sweeping statements that question people's intent and integrity in a general sense. Were there mistakes made over the years at the ATBC - most certainly - were there things that should have been done differently, most definitely. 20-20 hindsight is a wonderful thing - usually however it is the tool of the ignorant.
I largely ignore most of the rubbish written about bowling these days Michael - but there are some people who write quality words and who utter a view that should be both considered and respected.
I count you in that group Michael.
Jim Cross of course is correct in his view [Jim comes from a time and place that should always be listened to] - move on - except that if by moving on we trample on the good name and reputations of quality people who had the right intent and the necessary integrity then riding roughshod over them for the mere sake of moving on is not something I think we should take lightly - or indeed do at all.
There is nothing at all wrong with the application of a little respect.