Theres a lot to be learned through understanding the effect that lane surfaces have on "oil patterns". my question is what do you think kept the scores down this weekend. This same pattern has been high scoring in the past so what happened?
But in saying that nothing should be taken away from Matt Riley who bowled brilliantly all weekend to win the event averaging 215 for 32 games and also Jarrod Lean who climbed the ranks today coming from 15th after qualifying to get into the top 10 and then finish runner up to Matt in the stepladder after posting a 221 matchplay average.Absolutely Brenton. Many comments have been made in regards to the pattern laid. I myself didnt bowl nationals at Altona but others that did have openly said the pattern was quite different to that of last years nationals.
My apologises but i was just relaying some of the feedback i heard from the weekend from bowlers on what they read the printed version of the laid pattern.Kelvin maybe I can clear this up.
The original (first) pattern posted on totalbowling for the event was close to the Nationals pattern, but was not the pattern laided at either the junior or adult nationals.
After a discussion with Justin (Operations Manager) at Altona, a second pattern was posted on totalbowling around a week ago. This was the pattern you bowled on at the weekend.
This was a TBA approved pattern and met the lane conditioning policy for a nationally ranked event. The pattern was loaded into the kegel via kosi under TBA supervision and with the assistance of VicTenpins.
Muels and Grant - thx for the clarification- I'm pleased to learn that by and large today's elite tournament players don't walk into a given centre and expect the exact same condition the last time they were in the place - that would make the game about as challenging as coming in out of the rain.
I would be a bit more concerned with the fact that the tournament only attracted 57 men & 11 women.