Not entirely sure how this broke off into so many tangents, but then these threads often do. Anyway, I don't believe that questioning a rule change that directly effects people is such a bad thing and is not just people *****ing as always. We do, after all live in a democracy where we are allowed and expected to question rules that we believe to be contradictory to the nature of the business we are in, be it work or sport, or did something happen while I was sleeping last night and we were invaded by Nicaragua or the Taliban??? We DO NOT live in a dictatorship.
As someone who uses an ipod on the lane, I do question the rule and the reasoning behind it (I only use it on the approach and not in the player's area, it is a way for me to focus, is that such a bad thing?) questions that could and should be raised is why it is being introduced?
is it a safety factor? - do they believe people can't hear - that would be a fair cop.
is it an aesthetic factor? - nobody looks good with wires hanging off their head, not a fair cop.
is it a "team factor?" - do they believe that too many people sit in their own little world and ignore the rest of their team? is this not something that team managers should be able to police and create harmony in their own teams?
if I am behind the player's area waiting for my shot to come around, am I competing or am I waiting to compete?
instead of shooting people down for having opinions and caring about the sport they pay a lot of money to play, perhaps you should listen to what they have to say..............a little support goes a long way and will help to stop a lot of juniors leaving behind of the *****y politics that always goes on.