Michael Little
Active Member
A few people have bits and pieces of good reasoning in these posts but some are off base.
Pattern, ordinary for the whole crew of juniors, this has been agreed, my suggestion of dual patterns, some have agreed, this could be a logistical nightmare, but it has some merit. At least the scores are recognised for what they will be.
Nobody certainly suggests that the house shot should be laid out and some posters are talking ratios, yes they make a difference, but there are plenty of 2:1 or 3:1 patterns that play quite easy. Where the technical committee need to be more proactive is aligning patterns with house topography and the rest. Jez is right, no bowling centre owner is going to make the average lane condition hard, but if they have enough interest and the right machinery, they can certainly cater for sports pattern leagues etc. Remember everything that most of us are craving for here is what a small percentage of actual bowlers want. The avg house bowler doesn't give two hoots about a sports pattern, much like the actual percentage of tournament bowlers are quite small compared to the bowling population, much like the percentage of 'elite' juniors capable of playing on a tough pattern, small.
Some people have noted that if bowlers practice various lines, they should be capable of bowling anywhere. Unfortunately, this doesn't always happen. So many intricate differences in ball rolls, release, layouts and surfaces can make such a big difference, that if these are aligned, it wouldn't matter how accurate someone is playing whatever part of the lane they need too.
And I don't think anyone is disagreeing either how valuable the sparing is. 1135 single pin misses, are you bloody kidding me? That is a minimum of 11350 in pinfall gone missing somewhere, minimum. Not to mention how many possible strings of strikes and momentum these misses have ruined.
Sucks to say it, but if we are to focus on the elite level and want to focus on national team events, major tournaments in Australia and state team reps, it is quite obvious that there is quite a lot lacking in skill and knowledge at present and that we shouldn't expect too much from these teams when travelling, because they haven't obtained the necessary skill level to compete just yet.
This being the case, why not start to install a program now with perhaps a 5 year plan to develop our juniors and youth bowlers, and eventually blend them into the adult arena. No point worrying about results right now.
Unfortunately, it will be hard to do, lack of funding is a massive problem if we want to focus on the 'elite' level. But a couple of things to consider in an ideal world:
- How many current juniors and youth have coaches, and how many have access to training programs etc etc. What skill level are these coaches and how effective are they? Is there regular accreditation and continual follow up with directives from above as to how to develop the juniors and their games to attain a level to compete OS? Pathways again, but from National coach all the way down, there should be a pathway, feedback and continual advice to the local area coaches who coach our elite juniors and monitoring of these coaches, because a fair few possibly only have their certificates for the paper value
- Regularly have the information at hand to teach and educate, regarding some of the finer aspects of the game to help these kids to take themselves to the next level, see point above. If we want to develop the kids skills levels, no point just dropping the information on them, explain the whys and hows!
There is more, but I need to think about it properly.
Pattern, ordinary for the whole crew of juniors, this has been agreed, my suggestion of dual patterns, some have agreed, this could be a logistical nightmare, but it has some merit. At least the scores are recognised for what they will be.
Nobody certainly suggests that the house shot should be laid out and some posters are talking ratios, yes they make a difference, but there are plenty of 2:1 or 3:1 patterns that play quite easy. Where the technical committee need to be more proactive is aligning patterns with house topography and the rest. Jez is right, no bowling centre owner is going to make the average lane condition hard, but if they have enough interest and the right machinery, they can certainly cater for sports pattern leagues etc. Remember everything that most of us are craving for here is what a small percentage of actual bowlers want. The avg house bowler doesn't give two hoots about a sports pattern, much like the actual percentage of tournament bowlers are quite small compared to the bowling population, much like the percentage of 'elite' juniors capable of playing on a tough pattern, small.
Some people have noted that if bowlers practice various lines, they should be capable of bowling anywhere. Unfortunately, this doesn't always happen. So many intricate differences in ball rolls, release, layouts and surfaces can make such a big difference, that if these are aligned, it wouldn't matter how accurate someone is playing whatever part of the lane they need too.
And I don't think anyone is disagreeing either how valuable the sparing is. 1135 single pin misses, are you bloody kidding me? That is a minimum of 11350 in pinfall gone missing somewhere, minimum. Not to mention how many possible strings of strikes and momentum these misses have ruined.
Sucks to say it, but if we are to focus on the elite level and want to focus on national team events, major tournaments in Australia and state team reps, it is quite obvious that there is quite a lot lacking in skill and knowledge at present and that we shouldn't expect too much from these teams when travelling, because they haven't obtained the necessary skill level to compete just yet.
This being the case, why not start to install a program now with perhaps a 5 year plan to develop our juniors and youth bowlers, and eventually blend them into the adult arena. No point worrying about results right now.
Unfortunately, it will be hard to do, lack of funding is a massive problem if we want to focus on the 'elite' level. But a couple of things to consider in an ideal world:
- How many current juniors and youth have coaches, and how many have access to training programs etc etc. What skill level are these coaches and how effective are they? Is there regular accreditation and continual follow up with directives from above as to how to develop the juniors and their games to attain a level to compete OS? Pathways again, but from National coach all the way down, there should be a pathway, feedback and continual advice to the local area coaches who coach our elite juniors and monitoring of these coaches, because a fair few possibly only have their certificates for the paper value
- Regularly have the information at hand to teach and educate, regarding some of the finer aspects of the game to help these kids to take themselves to the next level, see point above. If we want to develop the kids skills levels, no point just dropping the information on them, explain the whys and hows!
There is more, but I need to think about it properly.