Hi Guys,
Without a doubt people will always protect their hip pocket and make the decision that best suit their personal situation. If I look at myself, I earn the same now as I did back in 1999. But everything else has gone up, so I will shop wiser. Whatever that wiser choice is, but it will be what suits me.
I think this is an argument that will neither have a winner or loser as the choice will be personal.
If every shop, not just saying pro-shops here, bought direct every product everywhere would be cheaper in every store. But that will not happen as agreements are made with suppliers to stop that practice. Though, the Chinese manufacturers have really destroyed that concept over the last few years. Lets thank the last 20 years of government in Australia for not protecting Australian jobs here.
I feel and this is my personal opinion here, that the suppliers probably have a lot to answer for with the high costs in Australia currently. Why, because I am sure they are working off out of date price books that do not reflect the current market price, Australian Dollar value against the green back. But that means higher profits for the Australian distributor when people support local first. If the suppliers had pricing that reflected current dollar value it would be a different matter. I know the argument will be, “but the dollar was more when we bought this now two year old stock”. Dribble!
Again just my personal opinion, but if it fits in a box you will eventually have to push it online to a greater audience, the same argument with book stores, the down side is they are going away but they are also going online to a great audience worldwide.
If it’s a service, never undercut yourself as your time is valuable and needs to be paid for and valued. I don't believe the service is something that is being disputed. What if you show the product at cost price and charged the true value of the service.
One: the buyer would think how cheap is that.
Two: you put the true value on your service and the two run separately on the books.
I am sure most business models are like this.
Let's look at the local suppliers that have a pro-shop as well, buying cheaper and selling through their own front door? I am sure they will be run as two different business’ to make sure they show different profit and loss margins. Not to mention the double dip..
Ok, off topic sorry about that.
Without a doubt people will always protect their hip pocket and make the decision that best suit their personal situation. If I look at myself, I earn the same now as I did back in 1999. But everything else has gone up, so I will shop wiser. Whatever that wiser choice is, but it will be what suits me.
I think this is an argument that will neither have a winner or loser as the choice will be personal.
If every shop, not just saying pro-shops here, bought direct every product everywhere would be cheaper in every store. But that will not happen as agreements are made with suppliers to stop that practice. Though, the Chinese manufacturers have really destroyed that concept over the last few years. Lets thank the last 20 years of government in Australia for not protecting Australian jobs here.
I feel and this is my personal opinion here, that the suppliers probably have a lot to answer for with the high costs in Australia currently. Why, because I am sure they are working off out of date price books that do not reflect the current market price, Australian Dollar value against the green back. But that means higher profits for the Australian distributor when people support local first. If the suppliers had pricing that reflected current dollar value it would be a different matter. I know the argument will be, “but the dollar was more when we bought this now two year old stock”. Dribble!
Again just my personal opinion, but if it fits in a box you will eventually have to push it online to a greater audience, the same argument with book stores, the down side is they are going away but they are also going online to a great audience worldwide.
If it’s a service, never undercut yourself as your time is valuable and needs to be paid for and valued. I don't believe the service is something that is being disputed. What if you show the product at cost price and charged the true value of the service.
One: the buyer would think how cheap is that.
Two: you put the true value on your service and the two run separately on the books.
I am sure most business models are like this.
Let's look at the local suppliers that have a pro-shop as well, buying cheaper and selling through their own front door? I am sure they will be run as two different business’ to make sure they show different profit and loss margins. Not to mention the double dip..
Ok, off topic sorry about that.