S
spectater1
Although the SPC tournament ran smoothly there was 1 contraversy that in the tournament that was not looked at very long... maybe because of the person it involved?
In one of the games on Saturdays qualifying round, Jason Belmonte "fouled" on the 6th frame of one of his games (he got a strike on the shot). To Jason's defense, he didn't know that the foul light went off until he came back off the approach and a fellow bowler (a friend of his) told him he fouled... I don't know if she saw the foul or not. He then suggested to his friend that he didn't foul (even though he didn't even know or look down at the foul line at the time) and they called a "no name" scorekeeper over to change the foul to a strike. After that strike, Jason struck out and shot 245 that game. If it was a foul, maybe he might have missed the spare and might have shot a 180... a potential difference of about 60 pins? Or worse off... what if he would have won the tournament and a protest was submitted to the tournament director? then what?
As a spectater, it was interested to see this happen and nothing be done about it or no one "important" informed about it! Why didn't the tournament director come over and make a ruling about it rather than a regular scorekeeper changing the score without thinking about it? As this was an important decision, why didn't "Belmo" get someone more important to change the score or talk to the tournament director about it?
Oddly enough, that was the only foul that was registered on both of those lanes and the only one during that game! Did he foul, I'm not sure because I didn't see his foot before he walked back but either way, he shouldn't have just changed it on his own... he should have reported something like that to the director so that he could make a ruling about it!
Food for thought for future bowlers of tournaments and tournament directers?
An interested spectater
In one of the games on Saturdays qualifying round, Jason Belmonte "fouled" on the 6th frame of one of his games (he got a strike on the shot). To Jason's defense, he didn't know that the foul light went off until he came back off the approach and a fellow bowler (a friend of his) told him he fouled... I don't know if she saw the foul or not. He then suggested to his friend that he didn't foul (even though he didn't even know or look down at the foul line at the time) and they called a "no name" scorekeeper over to change the foul to a strike. After that strike, Jason struck out and shot 245 that game. If it was a foul, maybe he might have missed the spare and might have shot a 180... a potential difference of about 60 pins? Or worse off... what if he would have won the tournament and a protest was submitted to the tournament director? then what?
As a spectater, it was interested to see this happen and nothing be done about it or no one "important" informed about it! Why didn't the tournament director come over and make a ruling about it rather than a regular scorekeeper changing the score without thinking about it? As this was an important decision, why didn't "Belmo" get someone more important to change the score or talk to the tournament director about it?
Oddly enough, that was the only foul that was registered on both of those lanes and the only one during that game! Did he foul, I'm not sure because I didn't see his foot before he walked back but either way, he shouldn't have just changed it on his own... he should have reported something like that to the director so that he could make a ruling about it!
Food for thought for future bowlers of tournaments and tournament directers?
An interested spectater