Mistagear
www.xgamesbowling.com
If Bowling as a sport, continues to have competitions allowed outside the umbrella of it's national body TBA, how can TBA show reasons why bowlers should join ?
Let me explain what I'm asking.
If ALL Sport Bowling needed to be sanctioned by TBA before it could be called a bowling league or a tournament...then TBA has a "product" which it can sell, that gives every sport bowler a reason for joining TBA if they wish to play the sport.
This is not currently the situation.
A Bowling Centre approaches it's customer (social bowler) and asks if they might like to join a League which the BC created and manages. The bowl owns the competition and introduces it's customer to the competition...So there is no reason why the BC should need TBA to exist.
TBA neither provides the competitor nor owns the competition.
TBA needs to find some way to make the competition it's own property(at least partially)
I'm looking for suggestions how TBA might become the owner of competitions in Aust ?
.
This might initially seem rather extreme but, what if TBA registered a logo and the names of TBA Bowling League, TBA Bowling Tournament and TBA Bowing Championships.
Then TBA could offer sanctioning of a league under the TBA banner and provide at least 1 coach be available at convenient times throughout the length of that league for instruction of bowlers. TBA would need to produce an "info kit" for the use of the BC which would assist in promoting the sport and would be seen as of "value" to the BC.
This way, the promotion of the sport of bowling would become a joint effort between the National body and the BC, rather than the whole process of creating and maintaining a Sport Bowler be the total responsibility (and ownership) of the BC..
TBA virtually feeds off the work done by BC's. This seriously impacts on TBA's perceived membership value and makes TBA as vulnerable as it currently is.
I'm not saying this IS what should happen, I'm asking for other suggestions how our National Body could be seen as an essential part of the equation ?
Let me explain what I'm asking.
If ALL Sport Bowling needed to be sanctioned by TBA before it could be called a bowling league or a tournament...then TBA has a "product" which it can sell, that gives every sport bowler a reason for joining TBA if they wish to play the sport.
This is not currently the situation.
A Bowling Centre approaches it's customer (social bowler) and asks if they might like to join a League which the BC created and manages. The bowl owns the competition and introduces it's customer to the competition...So there is no reason why the BC should need TBA to exist.
TBA neither provides the competitor nor owns the competition.
TBA needs to find some way to make the competition it's own property(at least partially)
I'm looking for suggestions how TBA might become the owner of competitions in Aust ?
.
This might initially seem rather extreme but, what if TBA registered a logo and the names of TBA Bowling League, TBA Bowling Tournament and TBA Bowing Championships.
Then TBA could offer sanctioning of a league under the TBA banner and provide at least 1 coach be available at convenient times throughout the length of that league for instruction of bowlers. TBA would need to produce an "info kit" for the use of the BC which would assist in promoting the sport and would be seen as of "value" to the BC.
This way, the promotion of the sport of bowling would become a joint effort between the National body and the BC, rather than the whole process of creating and maintaining a Sport Bowler be the total responsibility (and ownership) of the BC..
TBA virtually feeds off the work done by BC's. This seriously impacts on TBA's perceived membership value and makes TBA as vulnerable as it currently is.
I'm not saying this IS what should happen, I'm asking for other suggestions how our National Body could be seen as an essential part of the equation ?