Cannington, the question has to be asked

  • Thread starter You have been Munsoned
  • Start date
It looks like that from something what was good, (a lane conditioning policy) there seems to be some cracks developing.

The problem that could arise from TBA’s Lane Conditioning Policy is that any pattern laid down could be legal, as long as it does not exceed the 3:1, 4:1 ratio as stated in the Policy.

The policy doesn't go far enough it should have stated a minium, otherwise in the title of an old TV program “anything goes”
 
Thats easy fixed, just re-word the rule to say no more than 3:1 and no less than 2:1(or 2.5 to 1).Plus any mechanic that deliberately lays an obvious reverse block has NO place in the industry anyway!

Personally i think the rule should be anywhere from 2.5:1 to 3.5:1 ratio, minimum length 38 feet. And where a Kegel machine is used there's no need for tapes, because the graph tells you whats there.
 
I'm not positive but i think you'll find that the minimum oil is still 5 units gutter to gutter. You then start putting together your pattern on that basis while staying inside the ratio guidelines.

Could be wrong but that's how I understand it.
 
I would be very interested in seeing the actual programme used, which shows the volume and distance of the conditioner that is being laid on each board. And while we're on the subject, can anyone tell me what type/model of oiling machine is being used at these "ratings points" tournaments?

For those of you who aren't aware..The measurements that are taken after the oil is laid only measures the amount of UV additive in the oil on the lane..which is NOT always the same as the true volume of oil. Now you know why I want to see that actual conditioning programme.

I've been told by more than one of the Cannington finalists that the TBA "must have doctored the readings" in order for them to pass. With those scores, can you really believe that the lanes were oiled according to TBA specs?
You already know my opinion. :x

I welcome any and all rebuttal from the TBA or Cannington management.

Wayne
"keeping bowling honest"
 
DrewC
the policy states "the previous minimium five unit rule is replaced by the simple requirement of oil to be present edge board to edge board. This maybe one or two units, but the same above ratio exists."

Minimium requirements are needed.
 
My question is that if we are going to have a an oiling pattern, that has a ratio of 3:1 / 4:1, then why not also add a minimum amount of units as well.

As l have bolwed in both Adelaide & Perth, and found that the lanes reacted very differently to each other. I am happy to put this down to other factors, not just dodgy lane conditioning.

I found that the Perth pattern seemed to be shorter, giving a larger area to play in, which would obviously have given a higher scorer condition, as the lanes where a lot more open than Adelaide.

Everybody seems to be spending a great deal of time worrying about the patterns & conditions that have been laid. Perhaps it is time that we all stopped worrying about the patterns and concentrated on bowling, and ensuring that we do our best on what is put down in each centre, for each event.

It will not matter if the TBA buys a Kegal, and sends it to all national events, as all centres are different. Heat, humidity, air-conditioning, placement of doors, counters, roof height. All these things make a differance to the way the lanes play, meaning that you could lay exactly the same pattern in every centre, and gt totally different result, each and everytime.

I am all for a national tournament policy, to ensure that we bring bowling back to the bowlers, and take away the pie conditions. Lets make bowling a game of skill once again, where we need to be accurate, consistent, and all that stuff.

Not like we have been getting in some events lately, where all you need to do is just bowl in an area, and you will hit the pocket, and if your luckly you carry. This has resulted in a number of events posting huge scores, and taking away a bit of the skill from our great sport.

I for one have benifitted from this practise, and has ensured that a number of other people have also, but they one thing that l can honestly say, is that with the current policy of area bowling in place, in a number of centres & events, it has meant that l have not had to spend anywhere as much time tunning my game, as l know that as long as l am around my target l will score.

Lets allow the TBA to try and set some standards, and yes teething problems will occur as they do with anything.

Just my say.
 
i belive there is a minimum requirement, that there must be oil on the lane, if theres no oil, you go back down the lane to find where it is.


Once again i will point out, i am not complaining about the policey, it is a good policey, but i just want to see them follow what is in the policey.

roy
 
Back
Top Bottom