Hollywood
Member
Hi Hollywood. I have to say I am very disappointed with the decision to stay with the London pattern. Following the AO and the debate over what patterns are appropriate for our tournaments, I was led to believe the London pattern would not be used at Tuggeranong. Based on this, I decided to stay in the tournament and have bought flights and I know others from SA have also confirmed their travel arrangements. I would have withdrawn had I known what the plans are.
On your proposal for the tournament, I agree with Robyn - reducing the tournament to 14 games is only making a bad situation worse (especially for those that are travelling to attend). Further, increasing the purse is, as Robyn said, benefitting a few. I think the best option is to bowl 10 games on the Saturday and 6 games on the Sunday.
That will make it a little difficult for the "B" squad bowlers but please don't switch the times of the squads as our timing is already tight and I/we would definitely have to withdraw if "B" was moved to the Sunday afternoon.
The circuit this year has turned into a bit of a circus. I don't know who to hold responsible but I think the TBA have had a big influence on the Seniors programs to the detriment of the first three tournaments of the year. I hope we have learnt from this experience and stick to what we know works in 2014.
Again, it is disappointing the organising committee of this tournament have decided to stay with the London pattern. Is there any link between the decision to stay with the London pattern and why Warren, Darrell and Frank have withdrawn?
Cheers
Hi Glen,
Thank you for your feedback. Officially no-one ever said that the pattern was changing so I don't know why you would have thought that. After there were obvious questions asked down in Melb after Day 1 there was a meeting down there which I only found out about late on Sunday and was waiting for the official outcome of said meeting when bowlers returned of which it was then explained to me that it didn't matter which pattern was used BUT it still had to be a WTBA Pattern of our choice. Given that I had already looked at the 12 that I was under the impression we had to pick from ( the Olympic City named patterns ) I chose London. I then searched through all 27 that were listed, some old patterns as well still WTBA, London was still the best shaped pattern to suit Tuggeranong lanes. To be quiet honest it doesn't matter which pattern you choose they are all going to be hard because there is no surface left on any lane outside 10 board and I would say that would be the case on a lot of centres around Oz that are 10 plus years old and haven't been upgraded. Tuggers has just gone 15 yrs last Nov. At this stage after bowling some 12 games on it over the last couple of weeks and experimenting I'm still happy to be averaging in the 190's. It will just be a slower shot for most.
There was never been any mention by me of moving B squad to Sunday afternoon. The normal pattern of play will continue.
Unfortunately the first 3 tournamnents have been the guinea pigs for this selection criteria and that is something we all have to deal with frustrating as it is. I too will be looking forward to the rest of the year and 2014.
It is extremely unfortunate if people withdraw and It would be sad if that continued. I hope that doesn't happen. Everyone has to bowl on the same condition, unfortunately they have obviously been extremely tough patterns. But I am letting you now that this is nothing like what you played on in Melb given the scores and for anyone out there to say that it is going to be unplayable has nothing to base their comment on as they haven't as yet bowled on it.
Again thank you for your feedback Glen and I still hope to see everyone here in Canberra.
Cheers,
Hollywood.