Andrew S.
Gold Coast
It seems such a shame that the Nationals which used to be for everyone are now becoming the domain of the well heeled bowler.
I'm hearing more and more the comment ' too rich for me'. And even 'I wouldn't pay that if it was bowled in my home centre.'
Unfortunately because of the way TBA has structured itself it is left with no alternative other than raising revenue by indirect taxation.
As Peter has pointed out, there is no direct bowler income, so even a hypothetical influx of say 10000 new bowlers tomorrow would not give TBA one extra dollar.
Why ?
Because Registration fees for centres bear no relationship to the number of bowlers joining that local Association.
Therefore TBA has to investigate alternative ways to create revenue.
Looking at the cost of this years entry fees, it certainly appears to have found one.
I'm hearing more and more the comment ' too rich for me'. And even 'I wouldn't pay that if it was bowled in my home centre.'
Unfortunately because of the way TBA has structured itself it is left with no alternative other than raising revenue by indirect taxation.
As Peter has pointed out, there is no direct bowler income, so even a hypothetical influx of say 10000 new bowlers tomorrow would not give TBA one extra dollar.
Why ?
Because Registration fees for centres bear no relationship to the number of bowlers joining that local Association.
Therefore TBA has to investigate alternative ways to create revenue.
Looking at the cost of this years entry fees, it certainly appears to have found one.