GeorgeF
Hypercell = Hyperhook!
Do you think it is fair that local bowlers get to bowl on a tournament pattern prior to the event?
I think it is, because most of the time each state hosts just 1 big event per year. Subsquently, most of the entries are made up of local bowlers. The tournament conditions are different to normal league play so why not reward your locals for entering by letting them practise. Allow your locals to adapt to 'new' conditions and encourage them to bowl their best. Not allowing them to bowl could result in them not supporting the event the following year due to their poor performance on the 'tougher' tournament condition.
Call me crazy, I have a bit of state pride and would always want a Queenslander to win in Queensland, I'm sure NSW and Vics feel the same way. I know the Melbourne Cup condition is down for practise and those local guys can get lined up which I feel is a great advantage.
It's a shame about K&K but maybe for the future locals can practise on the condition at least 1 week prior. Whats your thoughts?
I think it is, because most of the time each state hosts just 1 big event per year. Subsquently, most of the entries are made up of local bowlers. The tournament conditions are different to normal league play so why not reward your locals for entering by letting them practise. Allow your locals to adapt to 'new' conditions and encourage them to bowl their best. Not allowing them to bowl could result in them not supporting the event the following year due to their poor performance on the 'tougher' tournament condition.
Call me crazy, I have a bit of state pride and would always want a Queenslander to win in Queensland, I'm sure NSW and Vics feel the same way. I know the Melbourne Cup condition is down for practise and those local guys can get lined up which I feel is a great advantage.
It's a shame about K&K but maybe for the future locals can practise on the condition at least 1 week prior. Whats your thoughts?