To whom it may concern,
Being one of the bowlers due to bowl in the HTBA Bowler of the Year on the 20th of March 2005, I am wondering if you could shed some light on the postponement of the tournament.
Due to technical matters which were out of the hands of all (tournament officials and staff at AMF Moonah) in which a malfunctioning power conditioner caused the loss of the computerised scoring before the tournament started. My concerns come about due to the fact as to why the bowlers were not given a chance to vote on the decision that was made.
If you had asked the bowlers, I think you would have found that the MAJORITY of bowlers would have been happy to have manual scoring put in place, as the machinery and lanes were otherwise functioning normally. Many bowlers would have been happy to score on their own pair for other competitors that did not know how to score. There were even spectators willing to act as scorers for the tournament. Can you please explain your logic as to why the bowlers were not asked if this was ok.
In my eyes, with the decision that was made, was made without ANY lateral thinking. It seemed to me that the HTBA were afraid of any extra work that may have been created, when if they looked at that solution, they would have found they would have been doing the EXACT same amount of work, which was entering scores into a laptop computer which was functioning perfectly.
As a person that was involved in bowling more than 20 years ago, I can remember this tournament, and many others, that ran flawlessly without computer scoring. Think of all the years this tournament was run before 1985, where there was no computer scoring, computers for standing sheets and the like. How hard is it to run up a little score sheet on Excel or another spreadsheet program for bowlers to write in their scores?
As I asked before, what was the logic in making a decision like what was made, when there were other solutions available, and the biggest question of all, why were the bowlers NOT ASKED before making your decision.
Yours in bowling
Andrew Phillips
We await your explanation.
Being one of the bowlers due to bowl in the HTBA Bowler of the Year on the 20th of March 2005, I am wondering if you could shed some light on the postponement of the tournament.
Due to technical matters which were out of the hands of all (tournament officials and staff at AMF Moonah) in which a malfunctioning power conditioner caused the loss of the computerised scoring before the tournament started. My concerns come about due to the fact as to why the bowlers were not given a chance to vote on the decision that was made.
If you had asked the bowlers, I think you would have found that the MAJORITY of bowlers would have been happy to have manual scoring put in place, as the machinery and lanes were otherwise functioning normally. Many bowlers would have been happy to score on their own pair for other competitors that did not know how to score. There were even spectators willing to act as scorers for the tournament. Can you please explain your logic as to why the bowlers were not asked if this was ok.
In my eyes, with the decision that was made, was made without ANY lateral thinking. It seemed to me that the HTBA were afraid of any extra work that may have been created, when if they looked at that solution, they would have found they would have been doing the EXACT same amount of work, which was entering scores into a laptop computer which was functioning perfectly.
As a person that was involved in bowling more than 20 years ago, I can remember this tournament, and many others, that ran flawlessly without computer scoring. Think of all the years this tournament was run before 1985, where there was no computer scoring, computers for standing sheets and the like. How hard is it to run up a little score sheet on Excel or another spreadsheet program for bowlers to write in their scores?
As I asked before, what was the logic in making a decision like what was made, when there were other solutions available, and the biggest question of all, why were the bowlers NOT ASKED before making your decision.
Yours in bowling
Andrew Phillips
We await your explanation.