Easy Tiger
Active Member
I remember walking into AMF Kedron Bowl in 2002, and the Queensland Cup was on. It was an awesome spectacle, watching Australia's best (with a couple of internationals, Andrew Fang from Singapore won it) and the atmosphere was great. It was exciting. I remember supporting the locals, such as Tony Hamilton who had made the 2nd cut, and watching him figure out how to get on top in each match. Chris Bombalas from Channel 9 Sport was on the microphone announcing the high scores after each block. That tournament was my first taste of national level competition, and I was a spectator who had only just begun bowling. 2 Months later, I was on my way to Bankstown for my first ever Australian Junior Nationals.
The Queensland Cup is now defunct, I guess you could say the K&K Classic replaced it much like the Koolfoam Classic did from 97-01. The K&K is an excellent tournament, and attracts large numbers which is fantastic. However, it was a shame to see the QLD Cup go, with a rich history dating back to 1978, when Allan Atkins won (he went on to win it 6 times - many people are probably asking Allan who?).
This highlights my point: what is bowling in Australia, what does it mean to bowlers, and where are we going? Every sport has traditions, and respects its past. Why doesn't bowling?
Then you fast forward to 2006. We take a look at tournaments this year (male entrants):
SA Cup - 82 entrants
AO - 89 entrants
K&K - 115 entrants
NSW Open - 63 entrants
Hobart Cup - 46 entrants
South Pacific Classic - 70 entrants
70 entrants for our premier tournament, our world cup qualifier?
Previous years:
2005 - 91
2004 - 112.
2004 is the last time that AMF really pushed the SPC, when we had zone qualifying and finalists who went on to compete in the tournament having won a spot, not to mention a prize fund which was $10,000 higher than this year's and World Masters Ranking Points up for grabs. It was really successful and boosted numbers. It gave the event great aura. I bowled in it this year for the first time, and to be honest, I was really quite disappointed with the lack of atmosphere.
At least they had a grandstand.
Then we look to the Nationals in Hobart, 2006, and AMF don't even want to erect a grandstand. At the same time, we are seeing regional managers go, and local tournament calendars with them, we are seeing AMF proshops close, we are seeing prices go up (2 games and shoe hire that's $19 please). We are seeing AMF support totally dry up.
Did I mention that Maquarie Leisure took over AMF Australia in late 2004?
Perhaps we see a trend there. AMF itself isn't the one doing this damage, it's the parent company. When the acquisition occured, many thought it might be a bright change for the sport, now that we weren't being given orders from America. Those that did their homework, had an idea how it would turn out. Welcome to the reality of Australian Bowling.
Now we have established where bowling in Australia is at, the question is what do we do about it. We are a consumer, we have the power to direct our business. TBA is also a consumer, but are in a tough position, as they have had an association with AMF since their inception post ATBC. Now that AMF is Maquarie, perhaps the relationship between TBA and AMF could change, given that Maquarie do not have the vested interest in the sport of bowling that AMF Australia (Worldwide) had.
A lot has changed in the last 3-4 years, and especially the last 1-2 years. Is it time to pull support away from AMF entirely, and focus exclusively on the independents? The worst that could happen is we might get treated with respect as customers (eg 2006 Nationals), and we might get some of the things we require to progress the game. But, to do this bowling needs a restructure.
We have seen a lot of tournament bowlers falling away over the last 5 years or so. My question is, why?
What makes you want to bowl in a national level tournament?
What makes you not bowl in a national level tournament?
Are entry fees too high?
Are tournaments being held in the right places?
Do people really quit competitive bowling because of the in-fighting?
Do people not bowl because they believe they cannot compete at a level comparable to Australia's best? (ie - Belmo, George, Brando, Frawlz, Terry, Carl, Little, etc).
Has the prestige of winning a national event diminished over the last decade?
Are there other factors impeding tournament growth and success in Australia? If so, what?
As a relatively new bowler to the scene, it is a little scary to see the change that has occured in bowling in just the last 6 years that I have been in the fray. It's almost like a general lack of enthusiam for tournament bowling which is contagious. It's hard to define, but can be captured in the "sad but true" comments that come up every now and again.
My aim isn't to be a doomsayer, rather to ask where has the buzz at major events gone, how do we get that atmosphere back, and how do we get the support for this sport that we require for it to grow and be prosperous long into the future?
Yours in bowling,
Tim.
The Queensland Cup is now defunct, I guess you could say the K&K Classic replaced it much like the Koolfoam Classic did from 97-01. The K&K is an excellent tournament, and attracts large numbers which is fantastic. However, it was a shame to see the QLD Cup go, with a rich history dating back to 1978, when Allan Atkins won (he went on to win it 6 times - many people are probably asking Allan who?).
This highlights my point: what is bowling in Australia, what does it mean to bowlers, and where are we going? Every sport has traditions, and respects its past. Why doesn't bowling?
Then you fast forward to 2006. We take a look at tournaments this year (male entrants):
SA Cup - 82 entrants
AO - 89 entrants
K&K - 115 entrants
NSW Open - 63 entrants
Hobart Cup - 46 entrants
South Pacific Classic - 70 entrants
70 entrants for our premier tournament, our world cup qualifier?
Previous years:
2005 - 91
2004 - 112.
2004 is the last time that AMF really pushed the SPC, when we had zone qualifying and finalists who went on to compete in the tournament having won a spot, not to mention a prize fund which was $10,000 higher than this year's and World Masters Ranking Points up for grabs. It was really successful and boosted numbers. It gave the event great aura. I bowled in it this year for the first time, and to be honest, I was really quite disappointed with the lack of atmosphere.
At least they had a grandstand.
Then we look to the Nationals in Hobart, 2006, and AMF don't even want to erect a grandstand. At the same time, we are seeing regional managers go, and local tournament calendars with them, we are seeing AMF proshops close, we are seeing prices go up (2 games and shoe hire that's $19 please). We are seeing AMF support totally dry up.
Did I mention that Maquarie Leisure took over AMF Australia in late 2004?
Perhaps we see a trend there. AMF itself isn't the one doing this damage, it's the parent company. When the acquisition occured, many thought it might be a bright change for the sport, now that we weren't being given orders from America. Those that did their homework, had an idea how it would turn out. Welcome to the reality of Australian Bowling.
Now we have established where bowling in Australia is at, the question is what do we do about it. We are a consumer, we have the power to direct our business. TBA is also a consumer, but are in a tough position, as they have had an association with AMF since their inception post ATBC. Now that AMF is Maquarie, perhaps the relationship between TBA and AMF could change, given that Maquarie do not have the vested interest in the sport of bowling that AMF Australia (Worldwide) had.
A lot has changed in the last 3-4 years, and especially the last 1-2 years. Is it time to pull support away from AMF entirely, and focus exclusively on the independents? The worst that could happen is we might get treated with respect as customers (eg 2006 Nationals), and we might get some of the things we require to progress the game. But, to do this bowling needs a restructure.
We have seen a lot of tournament bowlers falling away over the last 5 years or so. My question is, why?
What makes you want to bowl in a national level tournament?
What makes you not bowl in a national level tournament?
Are entry fees too high?
Are tournaments being held in the right places?
Do people really quit competitive bowling because of the in-fighting?
Do people not bowl because they believe they cannot compete at a level comparable to Australia's best? (ie - Belmo, George, Brando, Frawlz, Terry, Carl, Little, etc).
Has the prestige of winning a national event diminished over the last decade?
Are there other factors impeding tournament growth and success in Australia? If so, what?
As a relatively new bowler to the scene, it is a little scary to see the change that has occured in bowling in just the last 6 years that I have been in the fray. It's almost like a general lack of enthusiam for tournament bowling which is contagious. It's hard to define, but can be captured in the "sad but true" comments that come up every now and again.
My aim isn't to be a doomsayer, rather to ask where has the buzz at major events gone, how do we get that atmosphere back, and how do we get the support for this sport that we require for it to grow and be prosperous long into the future?
Yours in bowling,
Tim.